History repeats: Pandemic, labor shortage, and The Great Resignation
How can companies attract top talent through - and beyond - the Great Resignation and post-pandemic labor shortage?
If you haven’t heard of quiet quitting by now, you’re… probably not on TikTok. The trend took our social feeds by storm this summer, inviting people to “quiet quit” their jobs to avoid or manage burnout.
But it’s not actually about “quitting” at all – and the internet has been far from quiet about it.
So what is quiet quitting, and why does it have so many people rethinking workplace boundaries?
Quiet quitting is a way of combating workplace burnout, not by quitting your job, but by quitting the “above and beyond” mentality.
It’s a conscious rejection of #HustleCulture, which tells us we must always be pushing to eke out a competitive edge.
This always-on mentality has proven to be an unsustainable drain on our mental health, especially amidst market disruptions, inflation, and geopolitical unrest. And so people – especially younger generations – are starting to question it.
You come in, do your job, then turn it off at the end of the day. No checking emails outside of work hours. No logging hours on weekends or days off. It’s not slacking at work; it’s just setting clear + distinct boundaries.
It may not sound revolutionary on paper, but at scale, it can have a big impact. In fact, its history is rooted in labor union protests from over 50 years ago.Back in the 1970s, labor unions used the same tactic, known as work-to-rule, as a form of protest – particularly in industries where traditional strikes weren’t an option.
Quiet quitting applies the same concept to in a modern, corporate (predominantly white collar) environment. Employees are rejecting the idea that “above and beyond” is the expectation (which actually negates it being “above and beyond” at all, but I digress) to safeguard their mental health, and even affect a larger cultural change.
How can companies attract top talent through - and beyond - the Great Resignation and post-pandemic labor shortage?
There are a number of factors contributing to the sudden wave of quiet quitting in our culture. But it all boils down to one key word: burnout.
52% of the workforce reports feeling burnt out (up 9% from a pre-COVID survey). And according to another study, the “ratio of engaged to actively disengaged employees is now 1.8 to 1, the lowest in almost a decade.”
Outside the office, we’re juggling unprecedented stressors (including market disruption, long-tail pandemic exhaustion, geopolitical uncertainty, environmental crisis after crisis, and inflation, just to name a few).
“We lock up our homes, we lock up our cars... but when it comes to boundaries for our personal well-being, we just give it away. You know: just come in, take it, and rob me.” The chief wellbeing officer is a new, much-needed role to tackle the growing challenge of professional burnout.
Suffice to say, we have a lot on our plates. So it makes sense that more and more people are trying to prioritize their mental health by setting stronger boundaries.
But this current movement feels bigger than a blip. According to leadership coach and author @DrKimHires, it’s more like a labor rebellion. And there are three key reasons why it’s more than just a trend.I highly recommend you watch her whole video, but to summarize those three reasons:
Since going viral on TikTok, quiet quitting has been getting a lot of attention — from both advocates and detractors. And there’s been nothing quiet about it.
1. Supporters say it’s an effective way to set professional boundaries and protect your mental health.
2. And a healthy evolution that may even equalize the disparity in employee-employer relationships.
(“If the inflation rate is 8.5%, and you get a 1% raise, what do employers expect?”)
3. And frankly, they’re fed up with feeling overworked and under-respected.
4. There are of course those who discount it as Gen Z being Gen Z.
5. And others rightfully point out that not everyone has the privilege to quiet quit.
6. People are noticing how different departments are handling the situation.
(Note to managers from HR: This is not a “wing-it” topic!)
7. But many agree this is a leadership and management issue at its core.
8. Many more agree that the name is misleading (I personally prefer “act your wage”). Some even say it’s putting the responsibility on the wrong party.
9. But no matter what, “quiet firing” is not an appropriate response.
More paid time off, free mental health counseling, and regular check-ins via surveys: The focus on employee well-being has never been better - or more important.